Today Plan B filed a further skeleton argument in response to the Government ahead of the Court of Appeal hearing on 17th and 18th October:

Reply skeleton argument

“More to the point, the SST does not dispute the intolerable risks for humanity, according to the science, inherent in transgressing the Paris Temperature Limit. Unless he disputes those risks, it is impossible to see how he considers it appropriate to assess the risks of the ANPS against a less stringent benchmark, rejected as inadequate and dangerous.”